Between January and July of this year, Ghana’s health facilities recorded 53,415 pregnancies in girls between the ages of 10 and 19. Inside that number sits a smaller one that should stop every conversation it enters: 1,501 of those pregnancies were in girls aged 10 to 14. Primary-school children. Roughly seven a day, every day, for seven months — and that is only the count of girls who reached a health facility. The Ghana Health Service, presenting the figures in Accra in September, said plainly that the true number is higher.
For a girl of 12 or 13, Ghanaian law does not use the phrase “teenage pregnancy.” It uses a harder word, and this piece will use it too.
The children inside the statistic
“Teenage pregnancy” is a phrase that does quiet work. It gathers a 19-year-old who has finished school into the same category as a 12-year-old who has not finished primary school, and it lets a country discuss both as one soft social trend. The law refuses that blur. Under section 101 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29), sex with a child under 16 is defilement — with or without the child’s agreement, because in law a child that young cannot agree. The sentence is seven to twenty-five years.
The wider numbers are bad enough without the blur. The 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey found that 15 per cent of girls aged 15 to 19 had already been pregnant, and 11 per cent had already given birth — a rate that rose, not fell, from the 14 per cent recorded in 2014. The map is a poverty map: 26 per cent in the Savannah Region, 24 per cent in the North East and Ashanti regions, against 6 per cent in Greater Accra. Between 2016 and 2020, facilities recorded 555,575 pregnancies in girls aged 10 to 19, including 13,444 in girls aged 10 to 14. These are not fluctuations. They are a standing feature of the country, counted faithfully every year by the same state that fails to answer them.
What happens instead of the law
If the law were the story, this would be a short editorial. Defilement is a felony with a heavy sentence, Ghana has a specialised police unit — the Domestic Violence and Victim Support Unit, DOVVSU — and the Children’s Act puts the child’s interest first. The machinery exists. What happens inside it is the story.
In published research reviewing DOVVSU defilement case dockets, just 12 per cent of cases ended in conviction. Twelve per cent were recorded as settled at home. Two-thirds were abandoned altogether. The files contained letters from parents withdrawing their complaints because the matter had been, in the standard phrase, settled amicably. A separate study in the UCC Law Journal put it without decoration: most rape and defilement cases are withdrawn for settlement, which is against the law, and it is usually the poorest victims who are forced by circumstance to accept.
Ghana’s own Child and Family Welfare Policy describes the culture honestly. Families, chiefs and religious leaders, it notes, pursue “compensation, reconciliation and restoring harmony in the family and community, over the needs of the child who has been harmed.” Read that sentence again. It is not an accusation from an activist. It is the state’s own policy document, admitting that when a child is harmed, the system’s first instinct is to restore the adults’ peace.
The obstacles are practical as well as cultural. Research on victims’ experiences found that families must pay several hundred cedis for the medical examination that produces the report a prosecution depends on — an examination the Domestic Violence Act says the state should provide free. A poor family is asked to buy its own justice before the justice system will look at the case. And the men are rarely strangers: docket research found most perpetrators were known to the victim — relatives, neighbours, family friends. An official of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice told the Ghana News Agency that abuse goes unreported because many people see no crime in it at all: a pregnant child is regarded, in his words, as simply “a spoilt child,” and some men abuse girl after girl, unprosecuted, “in the name of marrying them.”
The honest other side
Three things are also true, and a serious argument has to carry them.
First, not every case is an adult predator. The same docket research found boyfriends who were themselves teenagers. The law’s seven-year floor waits for a schoolboy exactly as it waits for a man of forty, and families who hide a peer case and families who hide a predator case disappear into the same silence. A law that cannot distinguish a boyfriend from a predator gives everyone a reason to keep both out of court.
Second, settlement is usually arithmetic, not wickedness. Court offers a process measured in years, transport costs, examination fees and adjournments. The man’s family offers money measured in school terms — support for the baby, fees for the girl, peace for the household. A mother who settles is often choosing the only support her grandchild will ever be offered. Any reform that ignores that arithmetic will simply be routed around, the way the current law is routed around.
Third, the long fight over teaching children about their own bodies was not a simple contest between ignorance and progress. When Comprehensive Sexuality Education guidelines were proposed in 2019, the government let a rumour define a curriculum it had never publicly shown. Parents defended their values against a document almost none of them had read, framed by opponents as a foreign import. The guidelines were withdrawn. Only this month — seven years later — has the National Population Council relaunched the teaching under a new name, Reproductive Health Education, starting at age six. Whatever one thinks of the 2019 panic, a state that will not show its work will lose to anyone willing to invent it, and Ghana lost most of a school generation of body-safety teaching in the interval: the teaching that tells a child which requests from an adult may be refused, and tells her the words for what is happening to her.
Harmony, restored — for everyone but her
Notice what a settlement restores. The man’s freedom. The family’s name. The community’s quiet. The policy’s own word for the sum of these is harmony, and by its measure the settlement works — everyone at the table recovers something.
Everyone except the one person the law was written for. She leaves pregnant, or with a child, usually out of school. Ghana has a re-entry policy that lets a young mother return to class, and the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection said in August that most do not come back, because there is no one to hold the baby. The policy exists; the support that would make it usable does not. The country’s child marriage rate still stands at 16 per cent.
And when girls do use the official channels, the channels must still choose to move. At a senior high school in Obuasi this month, students’ written complaints about abuse sat inside the system while nothing happened; the Ghana Education Service has acknowledged its own reporting system failed them, and the school’s head was suspended only after a television documentary carried the story past every desk it had died on. The girls did everything the posters tell them to do. The system responded, in the end — to the camera.
The fix
None of this requires a new law. It requires the existing one to be made unavoidable, and the honest parts of settlement to be given a legal form.
Make an under-16 pregnancy a case by default. Every pregnancy in a girl under 16 recorded at a health facility should generate a DOVVSU file automatically. The state already counts her — the Ghana Health Service’s own figures prove the counting works. Let the same record open her case. A felony is not a family’s to withdraw; withdrawal letters should close nothing.
Pay for the evidence. Fund the medical examinations the Domestic Violence Act already promises free, and fund DOVVSU’s transport and casework, so that a family’s poverty is no longer the defence’s strongest argument.
Separate support from silence. The one decent thing settlement offers — money for the child — should be available through the courts as enforced maintenance, attached to outcomes rather than traded against them. No mother should have to choose between feeding her grandchild and prosecuting the man who made her a grandmother.
Give peer cases their own track. A close-in-age provision — counselling, accountability, supervision, not a seven-year felony for a schoolboy — would strip away the excuse that currently lets adult predators hide inside the same silence as teenage boyfriends.
Teach body safety in the open. Publish every page of the relaunched Reproductive Health Education curriculum, in full, where any parent can read it. Sunlight is the one answer to 2019 that costs nothing.
A country is not measured by the laws it writes for its children. It is measured by what happens in the room where a family decides whether a child’s case is a crime to answer or an embarrassment to manage. This year, before August, 1,501 girls under fifteen were counted in that room. The counting is not the scandal. The settling is.
Jollof Beats
Discussion
Argue the idea. Attack no group. Links and spam are removed.
Loading comments…